Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nick Chappell vs Jose Statham Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chappell vs Statham analysis and find out who is favored!
Nick Chappell vs Jose Statham Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chappell 4 - 3 Statham
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chappell has won 48.45% of points on their second serve, while Statham has won 52.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chappell, in recent form, has won 49.27% of their opponent's second serve points, while Statham has won 50.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.52% and 23.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chappell has saved 54.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Statham has saved 53.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chappell has won 47.95% of matches played (W/L 35/ 38), with Statham winning 36.84% (W/L 14/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 217/ 150), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Statham has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 19/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.36% of matches (W/L 27/ 17), where as Statham has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 34.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 7 times before with Chappell winning 4 times and Statham being victorious 3 times. They have played 17 sets in total, with Chappell winning 10 and Statham winning 7. The last match between Chappell and Statham was at the Mexico City Challenger, 31-03-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Nick Chappell getting the victory 6-4 3-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chappell and Statham have played a deciding set 3 times, with Chappell winning 1 times and Statham 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Chappell winning 3, and Statham 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chappell has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.85 while Statham has played against players with an average rank of 330.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chappell has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Statham has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chappell has converted 39.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Statham has converted 47.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
482
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
4
Total3
3
Hard2
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
716
Rank
279
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
53% (303-269)
Career Total W/L
57% (604-456)
40% (12-18)
YTD W/L
33% (4-8)
$24,525
Career Prize Money
$33,515
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nick Chappell vs Jose Statham For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Chappell VS Statham
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nick Chappell | Jose Statham |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 10 | 7 |
| Games Won | 88 | 88 |
| Aces (Total) | 55 | 47 |
| DFs Total | 21 | 39 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:6:24 | 2:6:24 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (345/567) | 61% (350/574) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (228/345) | 71% (247/350) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (121/222) | 49% (110/224) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (18/54) | 35% (19/55) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (217/574) | 38% (218/567) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 43% (3/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-1 6-7(4) 7-5 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Nick Chappell
66%
(
75 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
16
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
117
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 6-7(8) 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Nick Chappell
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
6
Aces
9
11
Double Faults
9
84%
(
47 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
122)
121
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Nick Chappell
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nick Chappell | Jose Statham |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (12/18) | 33% (4/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (29/40) | 43% (12/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (304/334) | 47% (134/150) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (9/11) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 75 | 48 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:13 | 1:29:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 265.63 | 288.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1238/2012) | 59% (439/742) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (817/1238) | 69% (303/439) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (375/774) | 52% (159/303) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (84/211) | 48% (20/42) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (807/2095) | 34% (245/714) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 18% (2/9) | 33% (4/8) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (10/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (12/30) | 33% (4/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/8) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 12% (17/2) | 0% (7/0) |
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Nick Chappell
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
57%
(
16 of
28)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
50
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Nick Chappell
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
39%
(
16 of
41)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Nick Chappell
61%
(
68 of
111)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Nick Chappell
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Kousuke Ogura
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Andres Delgadillo
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Nick Chappell
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Elijah Strode
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
2
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
10
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
24 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
30 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(17) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jose Statham Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Jose Statham
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Jose Statham
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Jose Statham
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
12
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
52
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Jose Statham
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
6
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Jose Statham
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Sinclair
Player
Jose Statham
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
13
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
11
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
110)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chappell Vs Statham Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Chappell are available here and Statham photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
